top of page
Writer's pictureIman Bakkali

Analyzing Consumer Perceptions of Lululemon: A Deep Dive into the Survey Results

When Lululemon launched in 1998 they did so as the first brand to take a community driven approach to athletics and yoga AKA their unique value proposition. Lululemon entered the market when most competitor brands were focusing on quality and price point but Lululemon chose to go through a different route altogether, instead of relying on the quality of their products to communicate the brand's value brand chose to compete in the market through its ability to build community for its customers and although Lululemon operates in the same industry as Nike, Addidas and Under Armour somehow lululemon 's profit margins is by far the highest among its peers with an average operating income margin of 20% over the last five years. For lululemon to command such high margins within the culture retail apparel industry the brand has to be doing something different from the rest of the crowd. To gain a comprehensive understanding of how different individuals perceive the Lululemon brand, an online survey was conducted, targeting a diverse range of participants. The survey delves into various and several aspects, including brand familiarity, reputation, product quality, and innovative offerings.


Demographics:

Before going into details of the brand perception, it is particularly important to understand the demographic composition of the participants, it provides context for the insights gathered.

The majority of respondents fall within the younger demographic of 18-34 years old. As for the gender representation which reflects a diverse range, including females and males with a notable representation of females which did not come as a surprise to anyone. This demographic landscape aligns with the typical consumer base for sportswear.

 

Familiarity and Reputation: 


One of the most important portions of the survey is unpacking the familiarity

aspect which reveals that a sizable number of respondents are either somewhat familiar or not very familiar with Lululemon, indicating a fragile brand presence.

These reputation ratings suggests both a positive and negative trend. With this percentage rating Lululemon is seen as having not built an effective brand familiarity in the mind of the international consumers even though it has a strong recognition in the sportswear industry.


Product Quality and Category Ratings:


The evaluation of product quality indicates a generally positive sentiment, with a significant proportion of respondents giving high ratings. Moving on to specific product categories, leggings and sports bras emerge as strong associations with Lululemon, garnering high ratings. This suggests that these items are central and important to the brand's identity in the minds of consumers.

Leggings: Universally rated highly, suggesting strong brand association.

Sports Bras: Varied ratings, implying a more subjective perception of this product category.

Tops: Generally positive ratings, indicating a positive association.

Coats & Jackets: Mixed ratings, suggesting varied perceptions.

Dresses: Receives lower ratings on average, indicating potential areas for improvement or focus. These insights gathered can help the brand in emphasizing certain products or adjusting its strategies to align with the consumer perception.




Innovation and Social Responsibility:


Consumer perceptions regarding Lululemon's innovation align positively, with a notable proportion acknowledging the brand as very innovative. The survey also dives into whether consumers view Lululemon as a socially responsible brand, it showed that the consideration of Lululemon as a socially responsible sports brand is mixed, highlighting an area where the brand may need to communicate its efforts more effectively.


Everyday Attire and Alternatives:


The survey explores whether participants perceive Lululemon as suitable for every day, relaxed attire. The responses given indicate different perspectives, with a balance between yes, no, and maybes. This suggests an opportunity for Lululemon to refine its positioning in the casual wear segment. Additionally, respondents identify alternative brands, with Nike and Under Armour emerging as strong contenders.



Purchase Behavior:


A crucial aspect of consumer perception lies in purchasing behavior. The survey inquired about past purchases from Lululemon and the factors influencing those decisions. Brand image, quality, and style & design emerged as significant influencers, shedding light on the elements that drive consumer choices. While a smaller portion of respondents has made purchases from Lululemon, a significant number has not. The reasons influencing purchasing decisions may vary, with brand image, quality, and style/design being key influencers.

 

Future Consideration:


Looking ahead, the survey explores whether respondents are contemplating future purchases from Lululemon. The responses indicate a mix of yes, no, and maybe, emphasizing the dynamic nature of consumer preferences. While some are considering future purchases from the brand, indicating potential growth opportunities, a considerable number of participants remain uncertain or unlikely to make future purchases.

 

In conclusion, the survey provides valuable insights into how consumers perceive Lululemon. This comprehensive snapshot of consumer perception of Lululemon shows that the brand enjoys a strong presence and positive reputation, in some product categories. However, there are areas that need further improvement, such as reputation management, social responsibility, and everyday attire positioning. Making some strategic adjustments could further enhance consumer perceptions. By leveraging these insights, Lululemon can improve its brand strategy to meet future consumer expectations in the competitive sportswear landscape.









Sources:


7 views0 comments

留言


bottom of page